News Focus
News Focus
Followers 405
Posts 52622
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 06/20/2011

Re: Lucky77Dice post# 68072

Sunday, 04/14/2019 6:20:54 PM

Sunday, April 14, 2019 6:20:54 PM

Post# of 154002
Actually the secured creditors were free to challenge it. But like I said, if the agreement results in a larger net recovery then why would anyone challenge it? They could either hold onto the $2K and essentially lose the value in the equipment/property at the Wayzata space (which as likely quite a bit more than $2K) or give Wayzata their $2k and sell the property/equipment and get more in return.

Nothing illegal about that since the secured creditors interest is served by doing so.

"Harsh reality is always better than false hope"

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today