News Focus
News Focus
Followers 218
Posts 26275
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 04/17/2006

Re: ano post# 518655

Friday, 04/12/2019 7:21:55 PM

Friday, April 12, 2019 7:21:55 PM

Post# of 865196

the problem with Moelis lays in the fact they do recognize the lawsuits



correct, Ps love it because of all their failing efforts in court.

it is important that in the next crisis not all their funds can be confiscated



they didnt fail last time, they just took what was not theirs and shareholders, common, suffered.

in the Moelis 1 plan they did not talk about lawsuits



Maybe, but Moelis is a Ps lovers dreamed up by Ps, they want to reap what they did not sow.


although they meanwhile figured out an IPO is not possible



companies make secondary offers all the time for decades, its how they generate cash for operations or R&D, or whatever.

So while looking thru above you will notice all are talking about, unjust, irrational, unlawful and when considering The warrant is bought for $0.00001, and not for the then market price ~$0.78, this is probably correct, as the government cannot confiscate something without return, unless they compensate of course.




none of them encourage warrants, its just a way to get resolved and keep them all happy, now that en banc and other cases are out there waiting, and Administration can do it without blood sucking congress and a Treasury and FHFA that obey laws, warrants are just one option until they look at legal ramifications later.


MC says "Whatever the policy issue, my first question will always be “what does the statute say?”
So that is a slam dunk for us



there is nothing in HERA that validates the warrants.