~ Reptile, Simply Put, Here Is What I Reviewed & How I Came To My Opinion ~
The Underwriters Litigation That Actually began back in 2006 / 2007, converted The Security’s in Question, To a WMI Preferred when the Exchange Event occurred, the Underwriters Litigation was subsequently brought forward against WMI when the seizure / exchange event / & bankruptcies were filed ... so OK’
I then followed the process beyond the WMI reorganization and subsequently through to the WMI-LT’s 10-K which actually explains what happened ?, why ? and how ? in acceptable detail ... the WMI-LT’s Trustee settled this Underwriters Litigation with Common Shares of the reorganized WMI That had originally been placed within the Disputed Equity Reserve (originally 4.3 million commons, no cash)
ok, so let’s turn the page;
Beyond the fact the the WMI-LT’s “Trustee” was truly given the authorization by Plan 7 to settle these types of Equity Determinative Claims matters, ... now, here comes ... griffin ...
Upon reviewing her objection ?, ... I found numerous flaws, ... including the Claims that are actually referred to’ ... not to mention the footnotes that borderline on hearsay and unnecessary and truly irrelevant negative personal references ...
In my opinion, ... filings such as ... “Griffins Tantrum” ... at this late date, NEED TO BE ... “Perfect” ... hers, is a long way from even being factually correct’, beginning with the “Bates” Heading ...
... If’ ? ... one takes the time to reverse sequence the Claims being referenced in the ... “Griffin Tantrum”, ... a reasonable person will quickly observe the flaws in this complete time wasting objection ...
Thank You, ... I appreciated your civility’ ...
AZ
