United Communications Partners Inc (UCPA)

[3itg]

I am not saying they would turn down a dividend... I'm saying we are NOT the "shareholders" being spoken of in the quotes by the LPI CEO.
Because, very simply, we arent the shareholders.
We own exactly 0 shares in LPI, its not publicly traded.
UCPA owns 5 percent of LPI in the same way they own 30.1% In Sight AS; in the same way they own 33.3% of HowCom AB; in the same way they own 75% of Tre Kroner Media Denmark; in the same way they own 40% of Media Team Plus; in the same way they own 85% of Local Planet AB.

What you are saying about their obligations to pay that dividend to us are wrong. Our shares represent fractions of the VALUE of the company. If the company is paid the dividend, it adds value, and we should see a proportional gain in regards to it.
The shares they own are an asset, assets are valued in cash terms and added to the overall valuation of the company.

UCPA is a holding company that owns and invests in Media networks, and their investments are what give our shares value.
This is literally the meaning of "Holding Company". Google it.

Any attempt to argue this point should be sure to include how their stake in LPI is somehow different than all their other stakes.