""I have not diluted one share" "
Yeah, I think he was paying a little word game with you. "I" being Medicao, not "vate" the company.
There is 0% chance that vate has not diluted 1 share. none. So he saying that was an example of being duplicitous. Just enough info to get you hooked, just enough going on, and then a big lie glossed over.
Does anyone here really believe that Vate has not diluted at all? Furthermore, does anyone think it honest or fair to meet with a shareholder and use personal pronouns to confuse an issue? "I" isnt "we", nor is it "vate.".
No dilution? phhhpht.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
