Limitless Venture Group Inc (LVGI)

[Euripides90]

Since the latest-PR's distinguish between: MOU and "Closed Deal" we can take them @face value, I see where stating something was "acquired" instead of signing a deal "to acquire" was signed would cause confusion and bad feelings - I've seen it several times before where the CEO is then accused of intentional misleading or even lying.
Which would've surprised Joe and made him feel bad as he does NOT seem like that kind of CEO!

With the "Forward Looking Statement" vs. a binding 8K you have to read it for what it is in any case.
AND even if 8K'd an LOI/MOU can still be "gotten out of" if certain conditions are or aren't met.
Without an 8K a News Release is just that - but there must be truth to the matter, e.g. a signed MOU or LOI must in fact exist, they can't just "make that up."

I think we can take the latest statements from company as FACT, "closed deal" in the case of 1 of 3 co's is pretty specific and IMO Joe's learned his lesson - and it was put out by King Consulting. So I would expect similar releases about CLOSED deals when they occur for the other 2.

JMO I don't think there should be doubt on the veracity of these latest statements or about Joe.

(P.S. to Zak, so you see I strive to be objective and factual - to a fault sometimes I'm told - I see your valid confusion & concerns but believe going forward Joe has addressed them and all is good. :) )