News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257287
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122810
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: gofishmarko post# 37342

Tuesday, 11/14/2006 1:45:59 AM

Tuesday, November 14, 2006 1:45:59 AM

Post# of 257287
>If IDIX's first P3 in naives is a failure, the second attempt could well be against a new SoC which has SVR rates of 80-90%, if VRTX gets lucky, so I think IDIX needs to get it right the first time.<

The official VRTX line for VX-950 is an NDA submission in 2008 and approval in 2009, so NVS and IDIX do not have their backs against the wall just yet. I agree, however, that they will need a modicum of luck in addition to considerable skill to make this work.

Whether the best design is a two-arm trial (with more alpha for each individual analysis) or a three-arm trial (which better addresses the commercial exigencies) is apt to be a tricky decision. I would place my bet on their opting for three arms and making the trial BIG (that’s what Big Pharma is for, after all), with the proviso that the FDA assigns a generous delta for the non-inferiority analysis.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today