Have your friends attend and record Roger's presentation. Get feedback from them if they can stay awake through it. Unfortunately, I will not be able to attend but if I was, I would be asking Roger a lot of questions like why did he delay that Christie Lake 43-101 for a year?
Is there 20% urnanium for the entire 50 meters distance between the two 20% holes or not? I refer to holes CB-109 and CB-116A Figure 1 Apr 26 2017 News Release see link above. Page 58 of the Christie Lake 43-101 suggests that there is not?
Page 58 of the 43-101 which is the closest thing we have to his promised 3D map indicates that the answer is 'no'. Still, the illustration suggests that there are at least 25 meters width (if you combine the red areas) by 8.5 meters thickness of 20%.
How much urnanium does the 8.5 meters thick of 20% Uranium for 25 meters width represent? Zero? Is Christie Lake Uranium calculated differently for some reason than other 20% drill discoveries?
This brings me back to the question - why did he delay the 43-101 for Christie Lake by 1 year?