News Focus
News Focus
Followers 843
Posts 122806
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: biopearl post# 1840

Saturday, 11/11/2006 12:15:51 PM

Saturday, November 11, 2006 12:15:51 PM

Post# of 19309
>What is behind your (hopefully correct) supposition that this agent [MM-093] should be safer than Enbrel et. al.?

I didn’t say that MM-093 is safer than Enbrel, although it may be; what I said in #1825 is that MM-093 is safer than Rituxan, which is the emerging treatment option for patients who fail to respond to the TNF-a drugs (Remicade, Enbrel, and Humira).

Why do I think MM-093 is safer than Rituxan? Because Rituxan, a blockbuster drug for non-Hodgkins lymphoma, works by essentially flushing out the immune system and starting over. It thus leaves a window of vulnerability until new B-cells come online, which is acceptable when a patient is fighting cancer but less easily justified in a disease such as RA.

Regarding the TMF-a drugs: Remicade, Enbrel, and Humira are together racking up sales of about $6B a year (!) but approximately half of the patients who use these drugs for RA do not benefit. Thus, there is a very large unmet need for a safe and effective treatment for these patients.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today