Vystar Corp (VYST)

[boston127]

Sterling: I cannot understand your post.

Maybe you were typing too fast, but I need some punctuation and a grammar check to try and translate what I think you mean.

I believe never again here with VYST where I believe there will prove to be sound reasoning for where the judge will rule in favor of VYST.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE which means they will have a chance to prove their innocence and they have plenty of proof:

What is the point of your post regarding the review in March and a judge's prior decision? Is this good or bad for VYST shareholders? I thought these shareholders paid off by VYST?

Please clarify and thanks for the information.