News Focus
News Focus
Followers 405
Posts 52618
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 06/20/2011

Re: HymanMinsky post# 58800

Monday, 02/04/2019 1:03:14 PM

Monday, February 04, 2019 1:03:14 PM

Post# of 153984
This whole debate is setting up to be just a repeat of the redacted “$4.3 million” in the APA debate.

There was no “other transaction debate” back then. It was simply what the number was going to be. Many felt 9 figures if I recall many of us said “not possible”. Then the US Court filing showed up with the APA unredacted showing $4.3 million showing we were right. At that point the debate shifted to the Canadian APA had to be “different”...a separate transaction...we said it wasn’t. It would be the same document...and once again we were right.

This time we are saying there is no other transaction involving the equity of BIOAQ.

And we will be right yet again..

"Harsh reality is always better than false hope"

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today