Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,444.25
(
0.58%
)
US TECH 100
28,659.60
(
0.25%
)
Dow Jones
49,693.20
(
-0.14%
)
Brent Oil
104.33
(
0.62%
)
Bitcoin
79,686.81
(
0.51%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 153977
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

trader59

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 203
Posts 17499
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 01/29/2018

trader59

Member Level

Re: 101King_Kong101 post# 58766

Monday, 02/04/2019 12:28:11 PM

Monday, February 04, 2019 12:28:11 PM

Post# of 153977
Yes, it is. Everything that you need to know about that transaction and the supporting LCY letter is right there, $4.34M for the assets. There's nothing anywhere to suggest anything more, and especially not another $60M coming. That's ridiculous.
The court appointed monitor does not keep secrets from the court and judge. If there were another transaction worth the $60M it would take to pay the remaining debt, it would be very prominently documented in the monitor's reports.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today