“Which is why some documentary time stamped proof is essential in determining priority of discovery.”
lol...time stamped at each place of business by employees with much to gain...and they will each have the same basic “evidence” while disputing each other’s...sorry, but what you are talking about is just nonsense lawyers use to make it appear to their clients that they are putting up a good case...both sides know it...but they each have to do it because they know the opposition is going to...
“So you are comparing the workings of patent and intellectual property law,”
uh, no...i was talking about you believing that a co-worker testifying that he was told by his boss that he developed the product a day before the other party claims, is going to be considered crucial evidence...it is not..and it doesn’t matter how you spin it...
i can see the testimony now...”yes your honor, i remember my boss telling me 6 yrs ago on nov 9th that he developed the product on that day...i distinctly remember it because my boss told me yesterday that if i didn’t, he would fire me”...
so no, the issue wasn’t comparing the workings of patent law, it was crappy witnesses and silly “documentary evidence”...
and i assure you, i know what i’m talking about...
“Patent disputes are settled on the basis of hard evidence”
EXACTLY!...now you are learning...
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
