bob41: Gimme a break. It was no "pump". It was fact...nothing but fact in my post. Unlike your twist of simple facts, having the auditor's opinion's referenced to is essentially the same thing as including it.
It was a technical mistake on the part of CSHD to do so.
What was referenced to and subsiquently included in the next 10-K/A was EXACTLY THE SAME THING.
You badger boys always take words out of context and spin them to suit your own agenda. F'n ridiculous.
No need to reply because there's really nothing more you can post on this subject that wouldn't be a spin of my words anyway.