Tuesday, December 04, 2018 7:52:17 PM
I understand what you are saying. Appreciate your taking the time to spell out your thoughts. I was actually delighted that BICX switched back to BICX 102. BICX 101 was going up against the bigger companies, and I thought it was a more likely losing proposition. Concerning its products, its products can’t reach the real finish line until FDA approval. Am I right? That takes time. So while it’s developing one product, it shouldn’t keep its options open on new products? I see the Narcam as a excellent move because it solidifies BICX’s foot in the door against the bigger boys (if it works out).
Recent BICX News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 07:31:02 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 07:04:16 PM
- BioCorRx Inc. to Present at the Life Sciences Virtual Investor Forum December 11th • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 12/10/2025 01:35:00 PM
- Life Sciences Virtual Investor Forum Agenda Announced for December 11th • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 12/09/2025 01:35:00 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:28:02 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 05:59:04 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/01/2025 08:15:38 PM
