'Excludes WAMU with total assets of $299 billion and zero estimated losses to the DIF
Have I told you lately how much I REALLY LOVE my Escrow ShareMarkers?
I believe that this refers exclusively to the loan portfolio of WMB. Here is why I believe this.
1) FDIC has no reason to address WMI so when they say WAMU it should be understood that it is WMB.
2) When discussing a bank, the primary source of assets is loans to customers that are outstanding. Conversely, the primary source of liabilities is deposits by customers. In every case I have seen when FDIC is talking about Assets, they are describing the size of the loan portfolio.
So, while what you say is absolutely true (there WERE $299B in WAMU assets), this has absolutely nothing to do with WMI or WMILT. This refers to what was seized by FDIC.
I have been a proponent in the past of saying that FDIC may have taken things and passed them on to JPM that should not have been seized. I do not believe those things were included in this $299B and even if they are, they are dwarfed by the size of the loan portfolio.
The reason I am making this post is to warn anyone who is basing a near $300B return for WMILT upon this information should beware. I, for one, do not believe that this applies to the value that should return to WMILT.