News Focus
News Focus
Followers 39
Posts 1188
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/01/2009

Re: Large Green post# 543206

Saturday, 10/20/2018 6:58:12 PM

Saturday, October 20, 2018 6:58:12 PM

Post# of 749756
Large Green,

I appreciate your posts and am not 'bashing'. All of the following is IMO.

However, I want to go on record with my understanding of the footnote at the bottom of page 7 you mention on your post.

FDIC TRULY states $299 BILLION in WaMu Assets - Yes, HUNDREDS of BILLIONS


https://www.fdic.gov/about/strategic/corporate/cfo_report_3rdqtr_15/0915_cfo_report.pdf


***Bottom of page 7***


'Excludes WAMU with total assets of $299 billion and zero estimated losses to the DIF



Have I told you lately how much I REALLY LOVE my Escrow ShareMarkers?



I believe that this refers exclusively to the loan portfolio of WMB. Here is why I believe this.

1) FDIC has no reason to address WMI so when they say WAMU it should be understood that it is WMB.

2) When discussing a bank, the primary source of assets is loans to customers that are outstanding. Conversely, the primary source of liabilities is deposits by customers. In every case I have seen when FDIC is talking about Assets, they are describing the size of the loan portfolio.

So, while what you say is absolutely true (there WERE $299B in WAMU assets), this has absolutely nothing to do with WMI or WMILT. This refers to what was seized by FDIC.

I have been a proponent in the past of saying that FDIC may have taken things and passed them on to JPM that should not have been seized. I do not believe those things were included in this $299B and even if they are, they are dwarfed by the size of the loan portfolio.

The reason I am making this post is to warn anyone who is basing a near $300B return for WMILT upon this information should beware. I, for one, do not believe that this applies to the value that should return to WMILT.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today