Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

Dream, a couple of obvious Kavanaugh lies

Kavanaugh tried to bullshit his way into selection

When President Donald Trump announced Kavanaugh’s selection to fill the Supreme Court vacancy, these were the first three sentences Kavanaugh uttered to introduce himself to the American public:

--
Mr. President, thank you. Throughout this process, I’ve witnessed firsthand your appreciation for the vital role of the American judiciary. No president has ever consulted more widely, or talked with more people from more backgrounds, to seek input about a Supreme Court nomination.
--

[Insert: Matrix999, Agree. Kavanaugh lied about never drinking underage.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143851927 ]

Neither the claim that Trump appreciates the vital role of the American judiciary nor the claim that he consulted unusually widely in making his choice is true. What’s more troubling in some ways is that neither claim is even a proper lie intended to trick people.

Kavanaugh was, instead, offering what the philosopher Harry Frankfurt termed “bullshit .. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/30/15631710/trump-bullshit .” The bullshitter, as Frankfurt wrote in his seminal essay on the subject, “does not care whether the things he says describe reality correctly. He just picks them out, or makes them up, to suit his purpose.”

from, Brett Kavanaugh’s habit of dissembling makes it hard to take his word over Ford’s
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143854765

Kavanaugh unarguably bullshitted and lied to get himself his promotion. Kavanaugh did a Trump, just not on such an abysmal scale.

See also:

Former U.S. Senator Al Franken
18 hrs ·

When Judge Brett Kavanaugh appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senators will have an opportunity to examine his record, his judicial philosophy, and his qualifications for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court.

I wish I could be there. Because I have some questions I’d love to see him answer.

1. Judge Kavanaugh, welcome. I’d like to start with a series of yes or no questions. The first one is a gimme. Do you think it’s proper for judges to make determinations based on their ideological preconceptions or their personal biases?

He’ll say no, of course.

2. Good. Would you agree that judges should make determinations based on their understanding of the facts?

3. And would you agree that it’s important for a judge to obtain a full and fair understanding of the facts before making a determination?

This is all pretty standard stuff. Then, however, I’d turn to an issue that’s received a bit of attention—but not nearly enough.

4. When you were introduced by President Trump, you spoke to the American people for the very first time as a nominee for the Supreme Court. That is a very important moment in this process, wouldn’t you agree?

5. And one of the very first things that came out of your mouth as a nominee for the Supreme Court was the following assertion: “No president has ever consulted more widely, or talked with more people from more backgrounds, to seek input about a Supreme Court nomination.” Did I quote you correctly?

This claim, of course, was not just false, but ridiculous. The Washington Post’s Aaron Blake (a Minnesota native) called it “a thoroughly inauspicious way to begin your application to the nation’s highest court, where you will be deciding the merits of the country’s most important legal and factual claims.”

It would be only fair to give Kavanaugh a chance to retract that weirdly specific bit of bullshit.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142202669

You have your proof. And there have been more.

09/17/2018 08:38 pm ET Updated Sep 17, 2018
We Know Brett Kavanaugh Has Lied Already
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/opinion-russ-feingold-kavanaugh-lies_us_5ba020f6e4b013b0977defff