News Focus
News Focus
Followers 4
Posts 82
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2018

Re: BBANBOB post# 537347

Tuesday, 09/11/2018 8:20:55 PM

Tuesday, September 11, 2018 8:20:55 PM

Post# of 749756
As Board stated on BP--The original doc that the judge supposedly signed did NOT have "and" in it--Only the LT was successor in interest to WMI--Period--The signature apparently was hard to read and could have been signed by someone else--Board didn't leave anything out--the followup docs had "and" in them---whyyyyyyyy........

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today