InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 3527
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/15/2016

Re: Spideyboy post# 15785

Thursday, 08/16/2018 6:44:24 PM

Thursday, August 16, 2018 6:44:24 PM

Post# of 43722
42% way over at the right comes from Phase 2 study

42% of those injected had any kind of response at all

The rest had no kind of response to injection at all

( Since that is the only such information published it is the only information I can use in my model )

But it makes the point, "it appears as only 42% of the test group are responsible to make a showing equivalent to 10% OAS of the entire test group vs. SOC"

Until new information is available, that's the best I can do.

So you see, the bar is really high. This "gold standard study".

Choosing what is the SOC is extremely important. This is what I settled on.

"
* This area uses the Table 5, 49.8% 5 year OAS from
and article in The Oncologist
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228039/
"

That number, AS I - referred to THIS article, is what Cel-Sci said is the right one from that article ( if I were to use that article )

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CVM News