Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

conix, your Hillary horse is spent, worn, done and delivered. See

“When he was reading those charges, she was guilty on every charge. And then he said, she was essentially okay. But he — she wasn’t okay, because she was guilty on every charge.”

Trump has it backward.

On July 5, 2016, Comey issued a tough statement about Clinton’s actions concerning her private email server, saying she was “extremely careless” in the handling of classified information, but he said it is “our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”

Comey added that the FBI looked back at previous cases involving the handling of classified information. “We cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts,” he said. “All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.”
.. an excerpt from .. Lyin' President Trump’s bushel of false claims in his Fox Business interview
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=130441490

You continue to ignore the importance of proving intent in the case of bringing charges under criminal law provisions.

Like it or lump it the legal position the FBI arrived at was that, in Hillary's case, criminal intent was not there .

One other, just for you:

Why the FBI concluded Hillary Clinton's email practices did not rise to the level of criminal charges
By David G. Savage Jul 05, 2016 | 4:34 PM | Washington
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-pol-clinton-email-legal-analysis-20160705-snap-story.html

It's history. Live with it.