News Focus
News Focus
Followers 55
Posts 2482
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/05/2005

Re: Stock_Barber post# 127461

Wednesday, 03/21/2018 5:11:21 PM

Wednesday, March 21, 2018 5:11:21 PM

Post# of 142017
I agree with most of what you say regarding Brian’s ability to run a successful business that to date has been able to turn a profit with minimal debt. I also even think that daveyo’s suggestion that JNS was holding the network hostage as leverage until such time they could get paid is plausible. Maybe the business model is more profitable by doing maintenance and installation contracts with EV charging providers in the Chicago area. We all know there are lots of chargers coming. There are many potentially good outcomes. I just think that shareholders should know more about what is going on by this point in the process.

However, during the period up until yesterday when Blink made the formal announcement, clearly there were still ongoing negotiations or Blink would have announced it themselves earlier. So I, in no way, hold the silence up to that point against Brian. Silence during the negotiations was most likely not optional...



However, I do find it absurd to think that there were still any negotiations going on regarding what assets Blink would be getting from JNS. It was clearly all stipulated in the asset purchase agreement in settlement of the lawsuit. How could you possibly suggest that they would spell out exactly how many shares (valued at $600k) JNS would get when the Offering closed, how much cash in 10 days, how much cash in 6 months, etc. without knowing exactly what they were getting in return? All of this has been known by both parties since the asset purchase agreement.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y