Sara- Matt could have clearly identified the ads in our posts as coming from ihub, which he originally did, but for some unknown reason changed that. Most of the other sites, if not all, DO clearly identify the ads' origination. All he has to do is put........ ihub ad: (then the actual ad) in the post
and I'm sure everyone would have nothing to complain or be apprehensive about. As it stands now, I do not want anyone to make me responsible for anything in a post of mine that I didn't put in there, unless it's identified properly. It's very simple. I cannot understand why Matt is so stubborn about the issue. If there's nothing wrong with the ads, then just properly identify them, and don't put any member at any risk, however remote.
As far as the imbedded charts, pictures, etc etc etc.. I don't like them, and I object to them. I want a choice as to what I view, and I also don't want to take a chance that someone is going to do something "funny" to my computer. If the bad happens because of someone doing that, who do I take it up with? Who is going to fix my problem?? I don't understand why it's necessary to allow people to do these types of things.
Disclaimer: Advertisements embedded in my posts at IHUB are the sole responsibility of IHUB. I do not endorse them in any way, have any input to their content, & recieve no compensation from them.
