Opinion - SEC Litigation Coming
My belief is Freedom of Speech is still in effect
and we Americans are still free to express opinions.
However, this is rarely true related to stock discussion
boards such as I-Hub, Hot Stock Markets and Allstocks.
"You have been banned for the following reason:
no positive comments...
Date the ban will be lifted: Never"
A very typical message generated by stock discussion boards
which are poorly veiled unlawful pump and dump operations.
This is what happens to many of those who are intelligent
seasoned traders who work at affording rational and truthful
commentary for readers. Our articles are of such a truthful
and of a powerful nature, our articles are so well written and
afford so little quarter for rational opposing commentary,
unethical administrators and unethical moderators are left
with no option other than to "ban" Freedom of Speech.
Quite unethical and a reflection of fear induced impotence.
I have noted Investors Hub is mentioned in SEC litigation
documents, mentioned as a vehicle to perpetrate financial
crime upon our unsuspecting American public. I will not
be surprised to discover Hot Stock Markets and Allstocks,
through research, have been or will be an inclusion in
SEC litigation documents.
As a future prediction, my opinion is I-Hub, Hot Stock
Markets and Allstocks are serving as beginning points
for future crackdowns by state attorney generals and
by the SEC, crackdowns against administrators and
moderators who knowingly enable financial crime through
their stock discussion board websites.
This enabling of financial crime is evidenced by allowing
known company executives to "pump" CSHD stock through
an administrator's discussion board website, without providing
a disclaimer to subscribed participants. This enabling is also
evidenced by administrators and moderators tightly controlling
what is allowed to be "said" about a stock, and what is not
allowed. No effort for readers to surmise only "pump" commentary
is welcomed by administrators and moderators.
Readers are already aware a good number of board
participants have been subjected to both civil actions
and criminal prosecution. Administrators and moderators
being subjected to the same is a logical next step.
An analogy is America Online, a decade back, refused
to be held accountable for crimes committed through
its facilities. America Online, today, is held fully
responsible for enabling "online" crimes and serves
well as a law enforcement tool to catch crooks.
SEC litigation documents directly indicate, at least
IHUB is being used as an enforcement tool to catch
crooks, much like with America Online.
For quite a period of time I have been submitting "tips"
to the SEC about select stock discussion boards which
appear to be enabling financial crime. Based on what
I read some board administrators and some board
moderators are vested in CSHD and their actions reflect
this in treatment of those who do not support a select stock;
those administrators and moderators are assisting and
enabling financial crime against the American public.
I have, of course, been submitting extensive documentation
to the SEC, documentation which is highly suggestive
CSHD activities are amongst the worst of securities
fraud perpetrated upon unsuspecting stock investors.
Administrators who have a vested interest in CSHD stock,
and board moderators who have a vested interest in CSHD
stock, who do fall under the definition of "administrator,"
both are not exempt from laws, are required to disclose
their vested interest as do stock promotion sites which
accept compensation for promoting a company. Not only
are administrators and moderators required to disclose
their vested interest for circumstances under which a stock
is being promoted, they are also required by law to disclose
company executives are promoting their company and stock
through pseudonym monikers. Anything less, is very clear
securities fraud violations.
I am reading a few select cases of not only company executives
participating at stock discussion boards under assumed
pseudonyms, but also discussion boards being moderated
by company executives. I am also reading SEC litigation
being effected against those select few who elect to
violate the laws of our land, through such activities.
Be sure I will continue filing reports with the SEC and
other enforcement entities, reports indicating perceived
violations of our laws by administrators and by moderators
of stock discussion boards. Investors Hub is already
noted in SEC litigation documents, I am sure other stock
discussion websites are or will be in future litigations.
My personal opinion is this CSHD debacle is the beginning
point of a new direction for law enforcement actions,
a beginning point for stock discussion board administrators
and moderators being used as "examples" to broadcast a
message, "You will be prosecuted for assisting and enabling
financial crimes against the American public."
Readers are warmly invited to export my articles to elicit
reader commentary and to elicit opposing opinions. However,
I may not be able to read opposing opinions because I am
banished from just about every discussion board, a result
of my being a truthful and talented writer.
First political law of effecting control over the masses
is, "Kill the intellectuals."
Dr. Kiralynne Schilitubi
Professor of English
Choctaw Nation
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
