Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

JimLur, Fetus sues mother's husband for invading his (the fetus's) home. Could it be one day?

"178 Abortion: President Trump on Jan. 19 became the first sitting president to address the March for Life, speaking in person
to hundreds of marchers at the White House and via live telecast to the tens of thousands of marchers on the National Mall."
.. your link .. http://www.wnd.com/2018/02/4621979/

Windy Nut Doily, eh. Chuckle, When a speech to an all-in receptive audience is
counted as an achievement you know they could only be talking about Trump.

Welcome back.

Oh, the fetus didn't recognize his father, but felt it had to exercise it's right to sue.

-

What's Wrong with Fetal Rights

A Look at Fetal Protection Statutes and Wrongful Death Actions on Behalf of Fetuses

No state interest described by fetal rights advocates has enough force to override a woman's fundamental rights of privacy, bodily integrity, and self-determination. . . . Until the child is brought forth from the woman's body, our relationship with it must be mediated by her.*

A pregnant woman and her fetus should never be regarded as separate, independent, and even adversarial, entities. Yet that is precisely what some anti-choice organizations, legal theorists, legislators, prosecutors, doctors, and courts have attempted to do in the past decade. They have tried to build support for the notion that the fetus has legal rights independent of the woman carrying it in her womb. Although this concept is sometimes put forward in very sympathetic contexts, it is laced with risks for women's rights. Theories of "fetal rights" have been promoted through different approaches in both legislation and litigation. Below, we will examine the threat to the constitutional right of reproductive choice inherent in two of these approaches: fetal protection statutes and wrongful death actions on behalf of fetuses. Continued .. https://www.aclu.org/other/whats-wrong-fetal-rights