Go Canada

[NYBob]

Canada should be Refining the Oil bitumen in Alberta & B.C.
It would make the Canadians richer than the Saudis -
Make it public policy in the provinces of Canada -
All Canadian Oil goes to China who save the oil underground for WWIII to destroy US & Canada in next war

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=138630167 The U.S. State Department

THE KINDER MORGAN PIPELINE & FUTURE SUPER OIL TANKERS SPILLS MAKES DESTRUCTION OF SALISH SEA, FRASER RIVER, WEST COAST OF CANADA AND US -


https://theconversation.com/the-kinder-morgan-pipeline-and-pacific-salmon-red-fish-black-gold-89520


Canada's Rich Nature Life Destroyed by Ugly Pipelines and Canada's Rich Oil Reserves -
Est. >Two Trillion Barrels Of Oil and
The Western Great Eco System Devastated -
Is the Alberta & B.C. provinces going astray, is it being seduced
by the development schemes of greedy multinationals,
suckered into shipping unprocessed oil- sands crude
south for processing in Texas and China refineries,
or recklessly developing the oil sands and make
ugly pipelines across US and Canada -

At the expense of prudence and the environment.
Alberta, Canada should be refining the bitumen in
Alberta & B.C. and should make it
public policy in the provinces of Canada -
It would make the Canadians very rich, richer than the Saudis -
The U.S. State Department
is considering a proposal to extend the pipeline which would
carry oil from Alberta's oil sands to Texas.

http://keystone-xl.com/keystone-xl-pipeline-overall-route-map/

Environmentalists have been aggressively protesting the line saying -
the heavy oil, or bitumen, that would flow through the line is -
dirty, toxic and corrosive.
Canadians saying the bitumen should be refined in Alberta or B.C.,
Canada.
Canadians want process the bitumen from the oil-sands in Alberta or
B.C., and that would create -
10000s of jobs per year for next 100 year + spinn off work for more -
It would be a better for Canada to do than merely send the raw bitumen
down the pipelines and tankers to China they refine it in China and put
in reserve tanks for WWIII that means tens of thousands of less jobs in
Canada -
Canadians can be the richest in the world - to pay for alternative
energy for all Canadians in the future.
Let us see the Western provinces to control the rapid
growth in Canada.
No public hearings about a pipeline that would ship bitumen
from Alberta's oil-sands to Asian markets refiners they control.
Canada should be more sympathetic to the CDN workers federation's
concerns -
Oil-sands projects should not exporting raw bitumen and
robbing Alberta and B.C. people of the benefits they would reap from -
upgrading it in the Western provinces etc. -
To ensure Alberta and B.C. have a value-added industry for Canadians.
Oil shipped to Asia would no longer be available to North Americans,
which will eventually raised prices vs. lower prices for all
Canadians..
When nwo take oil out of North America and take it to Asia the price
increase is going to affect all markets in the long run and make
Canadians to pay more for the gasoline - like what happened to the
forest timber - it has very long term negative economics for Canadian
people.
These oil sand deposits lie under 141,000 square kilometres
(54,000 sq mi) of boreal forest and muskeg (peat bogs) and contain
about 1.7 trillion barrels (270×10/9 m3) of bitumen in-place,
comparable in magnitude to the world's total proven reserves
of conventional petroleum.
Although the former CEO of Shell Canada, Clive Mather, estimated
Canada's reserves about 3 years ago to be 2 trillion barrels (320 km3)
or more, the International Energy Agency (IEA) lists Canada's reserves
as being 178 billion barrels (2.83×1010 m3). a few yrs ago -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athabasca_oil_sands

Wake UP Canada and do not let anyone rob you of the Canadian oil
resources and the Canadian people future wealth.
Will The Oil Pipelines Issues From Alberta to B.C. Deprive Canada's
People Of Canada's Rich Oil Reserves Est. >Two Trillion Barrels Of Oil
And The Western Great Eco System -
The Pipeline will create an environmental disaster in British Columbia
and Alberta which may affect our health and pollute Canada’s water
supply.
The impact on nature and the effects of pipeline construction and use
are:
* With the high probability of snow avalanches will create the
pipelines in many valleys will be destroyed in winter and the rain
season and the earth’s natural erosion will cause more natural
disasters
ex: by avalanches, mudslides, earthquakes etc.
* When these weather seasons occur the avalanches will cause damage
to the pipelines which will leak oil into the rivers, creeks and lakes
and it cause contamination for farmers, communities, cities and
to our water supply.
* The detrimental effects to the environment outweigh the benefits of
the short term boost to our economy for these construction jobs will
just be temporary.
* There will be minimal permanent jobs created when the project is
completed to the potential water pollution the oil may cause to
our aqua water systems for animals and people of B.C. and Alberta.
There are enough oil resources in the Tar Sands to produce enough
fossil fuel for the next 100 hundred years to meet the Canadian and the
United States of America oil needs.
Our Tar Sand Resources should be developed and controlled in Canada by
establishing a refinery in Alberta that is maintained
by Canadians and monitored for environmental hazards.
It makes more sense to stimulate the economy by creating jobs by
utilizing the trucking and shipping industry to deliver the valuable
resource that Canadians possess within their borders.
Our environment can be protected and we can still appease all interested parties.
* Premiers of B.C., Alberta and Prime Minister of Canada need to
re-evaluate their position on this issue.
* Recent polls demonstrate that >80% of British Columbia people are opposed to the pipeline construction.
* Our elected officials are supposed to listen to their constituents and
views on public policy.
The United States of America and China are strongly influencing
the higher echelons of Canadian society to gain momentum in securing
the pipeline access through our borders but more than the >70% of
British Columbians are not in favour of pipeline expansions are very
concerned with the long term environmental impact this will have on
our ECO-system.
They are only interested in oil for their economy and many countries
have already destroyed their natural habitants to the point that they
are not fit for human beings or other living organisms.
I personally feel that more research is needed in solar, wind and other
eco-friendly energy.for future needed.
Common sense prevails that ex. solar energy is eco-friendly and
a positive alternative to fossil fuel.
It’s my belief that we should be concentrating on developing the tar
sands for the oil that is needed for that purpose and continues to seek
out clean environmentally friendly sources of energy.
The construction of the B.C. pipeline would be good for people if it
was to be stopped and Canada made a refinery in Alberta to handle all
heavy oil tar sand resources for it will create long term work and
investment opportunities for all in Canada.
These oil sand deposits lie under 141,000 square kilometres
(54,000 sq mi) of boreal forest and muskeg (peat bogs) and contain
about 1.7 trillion barrels (270×10/9 m3) of bitumen in-place,
comparable in magnitude to the world's total proven reserves
of conventional petroleum.
Although the former CEO of Shell Canada, Clive Mather, estimated a few
years ago that Canada's reserves to be 2 trillion barrels (320 km3) or
more, the International Energy Agency (IEA) in the past - lists
Canada's reserves as being 178 billion barrels (2.83×1010 m3).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athabasca_oil_sands
Good Health Is Our Wealth -
- Love You - Dr. Kris Pastor -
- God Bless -
- Amen -