InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 826
Posts 119567
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: indigokid post# 18043

Monday, 01/08/2018 9:59:17 PM

Monday, January 08, 2018 9:59:17 PM

Post# of 20689
Eylea is indeed a much bigger product than Xolair, but there are downsides. As a bigger product, Eylea is likely to attract more FoB players. CHRS has acknowledged having an Eylea-FoB program, and there may be others.

Moreover, Eylea is a fusion protein (as is Orencia), which means it will be technically more difficult to attain bioequivalence to the reference product than it would with a simpler protein such as Xolair.

Technical difficulty has been MNTA’s calling card, but some projects might be too difficult even for MNTA, and we don’t want a repeat of what happened with Orencia.

All told, I’m not convinced that Eylea is a smarter choice for MNTA/MYL than Xolair would have been.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”