News Focus
News Focus
Followers 92
Posts 8868
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/06/2014

Re: PhenixBleu post# 284841

Monday, 01/08/2018 4:40:45 PM

Monday, January 08, 2018 4:40:45 PM

Post# of 298915
Case Update - Charlie Abujudeh vs MEC et al (debt collection)

Plaintiff Charlie Abujudeh’s two applications for writ of attachment/right to attach order are DENIED.

Plaintiff’s denied 8/8/17 ex parte application does not bar his 8/28/17 applications. To be sure, a party need not supplement its papers when its ex parte application is denied solely for failure to show that waiting for a noticed motion would cause great or irreparable injury. (Code Civ. Proc., § 485.220, subd. (b).) But the denial of ex parte relief on other grounds does not bar a new request based on new papers asserting new facts.

Even so, plaintiff still fails to show the probable validity of his claim. (See Code Civ. Proc., §§ 481.190, 484.090, subd. (a)(2); accord Kemp Bros. Constr., Inc. v. Titan Electric Corp. (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 1474, 1484.)

Defendants’ objections are SUSTAINED as to #1-15 and 19-22 and OVERRULED as to #16-18.

Plaintiff shall give notice.

http://www.occourts.org/rulings/nscottrulings.htm

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today