The Question and Answer Board

[J.C.N.]

Matt,

I have watched the attempts at distraction on SLJB go on for quite a while and for the most part the ban of 23 and for a short time 25 was very beneficial to the board. This helped all three mods on the board help the board to focus on SLJB for those easily distracted by J and J and to a lesser degree others.

I have a few questions that I am sure you can answer if you have time.

1. Are bans towards someone for different amounts of time based on their offenses or are they across the board the same amount of time?

2. Is there any benefit to IHUB for keeping any particular posters posting on the boards?

3. Greens definition of good posters may not necessarily be the same as your's or mine. IMHO J. and J. are excellent communicators and are able to get THEIR facts across the way they wish. So to me my definition would be they are good posters in that limited defined way.

As far as having much productive,beneficial and long lasting positive effect on the board I would have to say no.

4. Under the rules spam to me would be the definition of J. and J. due to their getting people off the focus of the stock and focused on responding to them.

Would you not agree that grubmaster's post of staying on focus on SLJB board recently with his post is in direct conflict to what J. and J. have as an agenda?

5. Is their a way Matt for a win win situation for green to stay and mod and some sort of balance so that J. and J. and any others that do the same can be held accountable?

Accountable in such a way that you keep their ATTENTION so there is little if any further distraction or spam on the SLJB board from those addressed in this post.

Thank you for your time and responses and my wish is that this can be a win win situation for all. If I may be of any assistance to this situation I am available.

Brent