News Focus
News Focus
Followers 2
Posts 44
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2016

Re: CBA09 post# 501056

Tuesday, 12/19/2017 11:08:43 AM

Tuesday, December 19, 2017 11:08:43 AM

Post# of 749756
Thanks for the response.

Do you agree or not agree that WMI (the parent) relinquished ownership of WMB when WMB was seized? The only ownership WMI had in WMB was in the stock of WMB that was abandoned (*worthless stock abandonment") which created the NOL).

From that point on WMI had no control of WMB or WMB subs whatsoever as WMB was sold to JPM as a "Whole Bank Purchase".


Your comment regarding WMI has control of safe harbor assets.

Do you agree or not agree that Safe Harbor Assets are the actual assets within the various trusts that are protected for the benefit of the actual investors (certificate holders) within each trust?

Do you agree on not agree that payment (proceeds) for assets sold into the trusts has already been received and the only future benefit (besides servicing fees) relating to these trusts would be the retained interest in the trusts and are recorded as an asset on the balance sheet?

On a consolidated basis in each 10Q & 10K the retained interests have been listed (I have gone back as far as 2004) and the total retained interests (not credit card related) were as follows:

in billions

MBS:

2004 - 1.62
2005 - 2.80
2006 - 1.90
2007 - 1.71
2008 - 1.23

It's been said that there was a minimum 25% participation in these trusts which IMO is not the case and the only benefit going forward from 2008 was the retained interests.













Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today