As you sometimes do, corporal, you paint too broadly what I actually said.
Your 2nd paragraph reflects an unusual concurrence, the totality of which I do not recall having experienced even in the paraphrasing you use. The conclusion you draw in your last paragraph is not necessarily applicable to all small companies iw which we are invested.
ARYC, MVES, PMCB, AMDA, XXII, AMRN are examples from the "hundreds" not shown to be "like this". So far, I have divorced the circumstance you relate rather haphazardly in your 2nd paragraph from the reasons PPHM remains a subject I include in the examples I cite above.