VinCompass Corp. (fka VCPS)

[THREE-DAY-TRADER]

***Who knew they'd actually dilute a Billion shares in only 2 months(?)
That's why I have called this stock (re-entry) I attempted since August an unusual anomaly'.
It simply was an honest mistaken bad trade that duped practically just about anyone since August. I've been in numerous amounts of subpenny stocks that had more than 300 million O/S when I first entered them (which was more than VCPS had at early August start) & they mostly turned out fine, and that's a major reason why I abdicated for holding it and adding to it (from .0008 and lower). It was a major screw up, but who would've believed they'd go from under 300 million O/S to 1.5 Billion in 2-2.5 months.

None of them I've ever traded diluted 1+ Billion shares in 2 months approx period.
There are those who chastise me for this trade, but truth is that it is an unusual predicament and an honest mistake, and some are not fairly seeing everything I do in the big picture regarding my full track record (that is good) & my strategy I apply.
Anyone who says otherwise about me is distorting truth or simply don;t understand, because all my posts generally back me up in all I state here.
...I've always suggested low risk on each trade. Any post (or e-mail) on subpenny trades I've ever put out always emphasized a low risk strategy.
My typical suggestion to anyone following has been a few hundred dollars per trade.
I even have posted examples of using $300 as a basis for every trade.
$300 in all my subpenny trades since last year have net yielded fine. It's not spin, it's simple fact.
The post below shows this example following my allocation strategy (thru August 1, 2017):
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134295662

If anyone has followed me a long while, they're doing fine even after this latest VCPS re-entry loss.

If someone put in $300 in my first VCPS trade back in late July, the typical yield range was 130-230% & they made between $390-690 net profit, & if they followed my standard allocation strategy and re-invested similar principal amount, then they are down no more than $300 on this re-entry (assuming a -100% loss), meaning net profit following me on 2 VCPS trades is +$90-390. If someone independently doubled down and re-invested past profits by putting in $600 (instead of $300) for example, then they could be down as much as -$210, but up near +$90 or close to break even... AND THAT'S THE REALITY scenario in terms of real numbers of anyone following my strategy with even principal allocation or even if they doubled their investment into the 2nd VCPS trade (loss).

If anyone has ever invested mush more than what I have stated repeatedly in all my alerts, then that is not my fault. I've always clearly outlined strategy for risk/Reward in each subpenny trade & all my trades have been honest without promotions or pumps. I never told anyone to 'load up', etc, like a pumper or promoter would say.
Overall my track record is good and this re-entry on VCPS is the only trade I ever mistakenly held with any resulting 'bag-holders'.
I've always taken responsibility for this latest VCPS re-entry foul up as stated in posts here in past weeks, but to be fair it's one trade & my last VCPS trade was excellent & my track record overall should speak for me, not this one fouled up trade.

Anyone can try to tell me I should have stop-lossed out or what ever (like a 'Monday Morning Quarter Back'), but it simply was a mistake & I thought (given my low risk investment suggestion) in weeks past we might get a rally back up toward .001+ while taking the chance on a low risk re-entry.
Most of my past trades were very successful and some involved averaging down, but in this instance VCPS (re-entry) was an unusual anomaly that surprised many by diluting over a Billion shares in only 2 months while not having even one decent trade-able rallies back up toward .001+.