InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 832
Posts 119984
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: alternatepatel post# 17839

Monday, 10/23/2017 11:35:44 AM

Monday, October 23, 2017 11:35:44 AM

Post# of 20689

…please explain how MNTA could have done better at preventing TEVA from switching…patients [to] 40mg [Copaxone]?

MNTA’s management was fooled by TEVA’s public statements in 2012 that 40mg Copaxone might achieve, at most, 25% of the US Copaxone market. In retrospect, we can see that TEVA early statements about the potential market share of 40mg Copaxone were misdirection and that TEVA intended to switch a much larger proportion of the US market from 20mg to 40mg.

p.s. It’s hard for me to blame MNTA’s management unduly insofar as I too thought TEVA would have more limited success with the 40mg product.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”