InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 794
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/14/2017

Re: Erd03d post# 131944

Thursday, 10/19/2017 11:20:43 PM

Thursday, October 19, 2017 11:20:43 PM

Post# of 207102
Thanks for posting the entire letter from Roger.

IMO, it is well-written and supported. I liked this paragraph. No sugar-coating it.

Defendant Schwebel goes on with assertions that Plaintiff would suffer no harm if fraudulent activity were allowed to succeed by dismissal of this action and refusal to stay the trading of this restricted stock pending resolution of this suit. No public company willingly should condone the use of its market to allow the public to be sold stock that was obtained by fraud. Defendant Schwbel does not make one proffer of his consulting services relying totally on his argument that one statute should outweigh those previously discussed. If the stock cannot be validly issued then how can its owners be allowed to seek resale. Defendant asks the court to become complicit in its fraud.




My posts may contain forward-looking statements which may be beyond the comprehension of any backwards-looking individuals. I speculate, this is the OTC after all. In my opinion, all my posts are IMO.