News Focus
News Focus
Followers 3
Posts 4060
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/27/2017

Re: zerohedge post# 121410

Tuesday, 10/17/2017 1:20:05 AM

Tuesday, October 17, 2017 1:20:05 AM

Post# of 163761
Zero; Why wouldn't you have an "exploding" share count on OTC and in Norway if the stock were shorted? If the stock is shorted, then SIAF would STILL have to increase the number of collateral shares (and hence the outstanding shares) when the PPS declines.

Newly converted loans and more to come? How come there will be many more to come if that is the case? Remember that the loans are non-recursive, hence SIAF doesn't have to issue more shares if they choose to default the loans.

You have checked that we have a 35% interest annually? You might want to check that again... First of all you're referring to the 1MUSD-loan (yes, one pathetic million), and second it's 2.5% pr month. Third; the loan wasn't for SIAF initially.

Zero bid on the stock? Wrong again. You might not have noticed, but there are actually just as many shares bought as sold, and the number of shares traded in this stock is actually quite high compared to the free float. Actually, if you pay just a minor attention to this stock, you'll see that Merkur normally trades with a premium compared to OTC and that Merkur - over and over again - trades green until OTC opens. That shows that there indeed is buyers for this stock, but that the trading on OTC infects Merkur. The question then is WHY does OTC trade this strange?

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today