You wouldn’t give them a product that reduces the risk of cervical cancer by about 90% (if one is not already infected) and reduces the risk of other HPV-associated cancers to a material degree? Although not 100% risk-free (no drug or vaccine is), the risk/benefit tradeoff for Gardasil would seem to be highly favorable, which is why the CDC recommends it for both girls and boys.
I find it surprising that some people who think ADXS is doing important work in lessening the scourge of cervical cancer would be opposed to using Gardasil.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”