InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,383.81
(
0.74%
)
US TECH 100
18,301.00
(
1.36%
)
Dow Jones
39,411.62
(
0.14%
)
Brent Oil
80.82
(
-0.96%
)
Bitcoin
59,548.98
(
0.33%
)
Post# of 252865
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

alternatepatel

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 12
Posts 1019
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/24/2013

alternatepatel

Re: DewDiligence post# 214138

Monday, 10/09/2017 6:15:42 AM

Monday, October 09, 2017 6:15:42 AM

Post# of 252865

In the Lovenox patent case where MNTA sued Amphastar and TEVA in US District Court, TEVA was able to get a summary dismissal by simply showing that TEVA’s Lovenox was produced in Italy and therefore not subject to a US manufacturing patent.



Why to have a mfg. patent then? You can always dodge that simply by manufacturing out of US? I don't think it would be that simple...

And if that's true, MNTA seems to foolish as they have handed-over their mfg. secrets to other exUS manufacturers to copy.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up