"May be Administration/DOJ and plaintiffs have agreed on administrative reforms. But FHFA Director still keeps on insisting on congressional reform knowing very well that it is never going to happen and ultimately may lead to some crisis. DJT Administration on the other hand has vested interest and also duty to avoid any crisis.
This may be repeat of CFPB and Collins texas case, where Tsy/DOJ wont oppose constitutional challenges. Same thing may happen with other cases and Tsy will be no longer a defendant party.
Under corporate laws, controlling entities such BOD/COE, management, conservator or shareholders have fiduciary duties of some sort. So below statement may not be 100% correct. But if Plaintiff, Administration and Majority GOP/RNC want to resolve this administratively for the benefit of all stakeholders, then courts will go with it. If Mel Watt does not fall in line soon, he will be out in no time. In any case Mel Watt may be few steps closer to exit."
I absolutely love that you are blaming Watt for a fantasy hypothetical and speculatory 'agreement' that Trump and the treasury came up with and Watt wont agree to.
The fantasyland you live in about who is to blame for what never ceases to amaze me.
WHAT AGREEMENT?!? Trump has done NOTHING! Yo Trump! Stop stealing our money!!!!
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
