| Followers | 431 |
| Posts | 57599 |
| Boards Moderated | 5 |
| Alias Born | 01/09/2007 |
Wednesday, September 06, 2017 12:10:58 PM
i will reiterate ..
gonna have to have the *negatives* convey to actual selling .. ;)
in the real world re: OTC targets
investors that have been successfully parted from their actual *shares*
*volume* increases vs decreasing the lower the PPS is taken
that isn't the case with PTOI .. and it hasn't been since 2013 ..
2009 ~ 7,188,642 ** (April start)
2010 ~ 20,478,838 ** CSTI imported/first hit piece & complicit *letter* of 9/28/2010
2011 ~ 37,204,277 ** NON RETAILs' *set up* .. (includes April's *still* record setting *volume* of 8M+)
2012 ~ 26,989,328 ** aromatics & mgmt change out
2013 ~ 36,808,995 ** P2O wrested back mid August 2013 .. wash trading 101 with 2014
2014 ~ 36,381,060 ** wash trading 101 with 2013 .. note lower than 2013
2015 ~ 22,275,997 ** note *volume* significantly lower than 2014 and a compressed PPS
2016 ~ 19,759,799 ** note still the lowest YTD volume for PTOI with lowest PPS ****
it's why *volume* in May/June of 2017 .. *increased* .. because actual time stamps and sale data was provided for 750,000 shares
(approx) actual investor sells
of course that number was *timed* by 4 to 5 .. but hey what was a few more in the mix after so many years of the like
now not to point out the obvious because it's always been about the volume (1 share for 1 share)
2017 is going down as the lowest PTOI volume since P2O first came public in 2009 (removed due to April start)
which doesn't fit NRs' patterns
as was noted to me just this morning .. here's to .0001s ..
as always not every actual P2O investor will share that sentiment ..
4kids
10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --
