American Security Resources Corp. (ARSC)

[gh0st]

Well maybe I should take it up with this particular attorney, but I'm not looking for anything in depth. Just say unusual trading volume, or delinquent filings, or question about certain assets or like here, claims in PRs. But more specifically, here they mention two PRs that reveal basically nothing outlandish. if this company was halted for those PRs alone, then there are some serious problems with how the SEC is conducting their decisions IMO.

"the company's business transition to the cryptocurrency markets and early adoption of blockchain technology"

so maybe the fact that they would be early adopters of blockchain technology implies that they were early investors in certain cryptos and would reap the rewards of owning large amounts?

the world may never know...