"first the rejection for prior art is done quickly in the first exam of uspto without look at the details." Exactly the opposite is true... Oh, and the link is to the WPO rejection, NOT the USPTO. "it is impossible to say with certainty if an invention has or not the prior art based only on the rejection of the first uspto exam." Not at all... there is a VALID issued patent covering use of piezos to power a contact lens! "That is why it is long because inventors has to show to uspto why their invention has prior art." Huh? Prior art is used to reject a patent... why would an inventor do that?