News Focus
News Focus
Followers 140
Posts 11663
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/15/2011

Re: Wernaaa post# 303676

Sunday, 07/16/2017 7:44:54 PM

Sunday, July 16, 2017 7:44:54 PM

Post# of 347009
Wernaaa, EXACTLY. Btw partnering is a PROCESS. Starts with talking to many, then keep some (short list) then pick at least one, do whatever is needed to bring a preliminary contract into a contract and then sign.

This Q/CC (past Friday) they said they were ALREADY AGAIN TESTING ON HUMANS. That means they tuned the test (they wrote so) and since they said before NO OTHER CANCERS without a partner we must assume it is AGAIN Ovarian.

So if this is a SECOND Ovarian (and given the results last time were near 100%) there is no need to run the proof of concept again. BUT they MUST run a test with that PROTOTYPE KIT they said they were going to make to show the partner (hence there statement last week that the results will be needed for partnering).

I guess that is the step going on now. But if you would say that PPHM is VAGUE on the topic, I agree because more clear language would be better.

Then with Ronin's letter I would be surprised that in the hostile situation Ronin created PPHM will stick to STRICTLY MINIMUM REQUIRED LEGAL NEEDED communications.

Peregrine Pharmaceuticals the Microsoft of Biotechnology! All In My Opinion. I am not advising anything, nor accusing anyone.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y