InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 70
Posts 5279
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/11/2014

Re: SooS416 post# 83185

Friday, 06/02/2017 1:21:04 PM

Friday, June 02, 2017 1:21:04 PM

Post# of 219011
Yes, of course, you make good arguments. CONVINCING


I'll repeat, . they created the so-called "subsidiary"
to bury debt ( obviously ) but they conveyed ZERO
ASSETS INTO THE SUBSIDIARY.


NSAV HAS NO ASSETS, not lately.


Creating a "subsidiary" to capture DEBT ONLY,
but simultaneously conveying NO ASSETS into
the subsidiary is prima facie fraudulent.



Too easy, the jury will be out for about 3 minutes.


Until2017