I would appreciate a clarification on this one. As I said, my patents knowledge stinks.
- They're receiving patents on the use of someone else's compounds in a specific indication?
- If they have a novel compound with its own IP, why do they need use patents of baricitinib / juxolitinib? Is it in an attempt to block the latter two from being used in that indication?
- Incyte is moving ahead with a topical formulation in this indication. Is that due to these patent applications?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.