News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257262
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122802
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: jbog post# 210452

Wednesday, 04/05/2017 4:28:09 PM

Wednesday, April 05, 2017 4:28:09 PM

Post# of 257262
Re: MNTA /interchangeable FoBs

I thought the trial duration was too short (52 weeks) to incorporate that quantity of switches.

52 weeks in toto seems like plenty of time to do the required three switches, allowing three months of dosing between each switch.

There is a need for a full PK, PD, and immunogenicity sampling done after each switch, which I thought you would need a decent time for a washout to the previous treatment to be valid.

That’s not practical, and I don’t think it’s what the FDA is looking for. When switching is done in patients—as opposed to healthy volunteers—you cannot ethically have a washout period. PK/PD bioequivalence is shown in a separate study (which MNTA conducted for M934), and it is not the impetus for switching.

Hope you’re right because it doesn't pass the smell test to me.

That’s what makes a market! (As far as I know, you’re not currently long MNTA, but I am.)

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now