News Focus
News Focus
Followers 56
Posts 14300
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2009

Re: mike41 post# 130841

Saturday, 04/01/2017 8:35:16 PM

Saturday, April 01, 2017 8:35:16 PM

Post# of 146479
Two ingredients are lacking for there to be "trade secrets".

- First, there is nothing of commercial value (i.e. PROFITABLE) to protect by a trade secret.

- Second, in the imaginary universe in which NNVC gets a product to market in ten or twenty years from now, a "trade secret" doesn't stop the best minds in well-funded pharma from doing it better and entering the market. In stark contrast, a live patent would stop others from entering the market.

Ergo, the "trade secret" excuse is just another attempt by Seymour to swindle the investing public into believing that Diwan's worthless aging patent isn't of concern.

A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. Friedrich Nietzsche

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NNVC News