you obviously didn't read the nyt's article .... I'm assuming that perhaps you're fearful that your eyes may fall out from reading a legitimate news source? .. Anyway, here it is and there is much that is in direct dispute with what you are saying... Too many suspicions, you had a bunch of rookies making that decision (with ulterior motives ) and therefore they bungled it .. whereas IF they had taken more time talked to more people perhaps we would have had a different outcome .. you know 'a clean one'? .... instead of dirty like him and him and the other two . .that had no experience nor business making that decision .. filth!