InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 1224
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2014

Re: Robdoc post# 50439

Tuesday, 02/28/2017 10:50:53 AM

Tuesday, February 28, 2017 10:50:53 AM

Post# of 140475
I'm in agreement.

As I mentioned in one of my most recent posts - the IP research project, and the IP attorney for both parties MAY cause said attorney to to inform the "other" party that they have in fact crossed the line, and thereby done the M/A work for Mc/Titan. Too easy. Takes vision, and I think Mc saw it during the interview process, and it was part of his 100 day plan to the BoD.

IP is very sticky and prickly. It would cause the Verb design to stop immediately. And to Fly's point, why engage the exact same firm and lawyer? Strategy on the corporate battlefield. That was calculated, a.k.a. not random.

Working through the IP attorney would also have the leverage to issue the requisite NDA's to all involved. And I think the Verb CEO is choosing his words VERY carefully.

Just what I think based on seeing the dots and my logic as it applies to the next generation of digital surgical robotics. SPORT IS the sweet spot.

JMO

Regards,
BK