"The banking records of Defendant Hop-on Inc do not demonstrate that it was involved in any business pursuit. Rather, it appears to have served as an alter-ego for Defendant Peter Michaels and as a conduit to fund his lifestyle."
"The evidence establishes that at the time Defendant Peter Michaels made representation to Plaintiff's agents that Defendant Hop-On , Inc. could provide products, he knew those statements to be false and had no intention to secure products for Plaintiff."
I liked that tweet response to the Hop-On stock promotion. Shows clearly that Peter Michaels continues to be known as a scammer and fraud.[/i]
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
