Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[10bambam]

Donald Trump’s budget director’s Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bill would socialize risk and privatize profit
Rep. Mitch Mulvaney, who Trump tapped to be budget director, is the swampiest swamp thing of them all
MATTHEW ROZSA SKIP TO COMMENTS
TOPICS: DONALD TRUMP, FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC, MITCH MULVANEY, BUSINESS NEWS, NEWS, POLITICS NEWS

Donald Trump's budget director's Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bill would socialize risk and privatize profit
FILE - This Monday, Aug. 8, 2011 file photo shows the Fannie Mae headquarters in Washington. (Credit: AP)
President-elect Donald Trump’s choice for budget director, Rep. Mick Mulvaney of South Carolina, sponsored legislation in April that would release Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from government control — likely costing taxpayers billions in the process.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are housing entities created by the government and referred to collectively as the GSEs, or government-sponsored enterprises. When George W. Bush’s treasury secretary Henry Paulson put them into conservatorship nine days before Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy in September 2008, he pledged for the government to cover their costs. This ultimately amounted to $187 billion.

While it may seem then like a good idea for the government to rid itself of Fannie and Freddie, Mulvaney’s “Housing Finance Restructuring Act of 2016? will only further line their pockets at taxpayer expense.

“Unlike earlier housing finance reform proposals, the Mulvaney bill does not phase out Fannie or Freddie,” wrote The Wall Street Journal in May. “Rather, it requires both companies to retain earnings to build capital until their capitalization reaches 5 percent of assets. They would be released from conservatorship when capital reaches 2.5 percent of assets.”

Not only would this reverse the existing government policy, which annually reduces the capital cushions received by each company until hitting zero in 2018, but it also cancels the requirement that the companies pay a dividend to the treasury department every fiscal quarter. The government’s shares (which the bill would cancel) have a liquidation preference of $187 billion (appropriately), but last year the GSEs only paid dividends amounting to $15.8 billion to the treasury department. Since 2012 a change to the bailout agreements required companies to pay nearly all of their profits to the treasury department, and Mulvaney’s bill would effectively nullify this as well.


SPONSORED STORIES
Growing Family? Check Out These 6 Financial Tips
Growing Family? Check Out These 6 Financial Tips
WFA
Four Reasons Why Cooking Beats Ordering In
Four Reasons Why Cooking Beats Ordering In
Blue Apron
This Brilliant Company Is Disrupting a $200 Billion Industry
This Brilliant Company Is Disrupting a $200 Billion Industry
EverQuote
Recommended by
“Most strikingly, the bill would bar Treasury from charging the companies for the remaining $258 billion the government has pledged as ongoing support for the companies,” The Wall Street Journal wrote. “Which means Fannie and Freddie would enjoy an explicit government backstop in perpetuity for which they would pay nothing.”

As it later added, “The current dividend amounts to a perpetuity owned by taxpayers. Under standard financial calculations, at an assumed discount rate of 4 percent, the present value of $15.8 billion annual payment would be $395 billion. Under the bill, Treasury surrenders that for nothing.”

When combined with the price of the prohibition on charging the backstop, the total cost of Mulvaney’s bill will equal roughly $405 billion. The beneficiaries would be investors in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

In September, the same month that it was first reported that Mulvaney was working on this bill, employees of Perry Capital — a major shareholder in Fannie and Freddie — as well as lawyers from Gibson Dunn, which lobbies for Perry Capital, donated $4,500 to Mulvaney’s political campaigns.

http://www.salon.com/2016/12/22/donald-trumps-budget-directors-fannie-mae-and-freddy-mac-bill-would-socialize-risk-and-privatize-profit/