News Focus
News Focus
Followers 5
Posts 960
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/17/2013

Re: Capt_Smith77 post# 47134

Thursday, 01/26/2017 4:28:41 PM

Thursday, January 26, 2017 4:28:41 PM

Post# of 82004
In my mind, we have:

1. Another early adapter evaluating (P&W). = $0 booked future revenue. We have a few of these. But - this probably paid some lower engineer's salary for the year, so that's good.

2. "Up to $6M" contract (unknown OEM)
Let's say I develop a new sound patch for the "Pro Tools" audio recording platform - call it the "Sick Sigma Delay and Distortion" module. To get financing, if I were to base my revenue estimates on the assumption every Pro Tools user is going to buy my expensive add-on, I would be misleading my investors. I believe this analogy is applicable here. None of the OEM's customers may want SGLB - for whatever reason. Again - $0 booked future revenue. Maybe is better than not, but does nothing for PPS as we have learned.

Maybe that's a conservative - even negative perspective, but it's paid for.

Until the day they outright book a solid order for real money with support contracts & the works, it's all bs.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y